Could you forgive? There are no easy answers, but LOST FOR LIFE will begin that very  important dialogue. If you would like to show the film or be in touch with the filmmakers,  please contact me at  And check out these links. Regardless of where you think you stand on the issue of  redemption vs. retribution, you will find there are no easy answers. Link to Lost for Life first trailer, press kit, and more: Separate YouTube Trailer Link: Huffington Post review:  resolution-_b_3558941.html  Nantucket Film Interview (20 minutes) If the link doesn’t take you directly there, type in  Lost for Life and/or Joshua Rofe  
LOST FOR LIFE, a powerful documentary about juveniles who committed heinous crimes and are serving life sentences, asks the question Could You Forgive? LOST FOR LIFE has Colorado connections with two prisoners, Josiah Ivy and Jacob Ind, a victim, family members, and Sean Taylor, who received a life sentence as a juvenile and had his sentence commuted by Governor Bill Ritter.
Colorado has effectively abolished the Death Penalty.  The Aurora Theater massacre and the  execution of 5 people in a bar in Denver did not move the juries to give the Death Penalty after  finding very bad extenuating circumstances.  The Chuckie Cheese mass shooter has had his  sentence stayed, perhaps forever.    So the worst that a planned mass murder by an Adult or a execution of many people by an Adult  can get is Life without Parole.  The worst of the worst Adults.  Why then would we give the same  sentence or anything like it to a juvenile who had killed one person? Or to a juvenile who was  abused and killed those that abused them?  Or to a drive-by shooter who could not know the  target?  Or to a juvenile  accomplice, a juvenile complicitor, a juvenile felony murderer in the car,  or any kind of kid who didn't pull the trigger?  The SCOTUS ruled correctly and intelligently.  Kids, in Colorado, no matter how heinous the  crime deserve at least one step less than that given to adults, not Life without Parole.   And most  of them deserve a chance to prove that now that they are adults they have understood the wrong  they imposed on another human, their family and the community from killing that person.   They  deserve the opportunity after many years of living a very good life inside of the walls of a very  bad place, a prison, to show that they can function in society. They deserve an individual hearing on what they have accomplished since they were convicted.  They are not adults and have to be treated differently.   This was the main theme of the Miller  decision and by its being applied to all juveniles no matter the state of their case.  Treat them  differently than Adults, and treat them differently than one another.  Let their environment prior to  the crime, their actions at the crime and their lives since being imprisoned be the guide posts of  determining their futures. 
Copyright © 2002-2015 All rights reserved. Read our Terms of Use  
Senate bill 180: Applies to all juveniles who have  served twenty years or more in Department of  Corrections. This includes virtual lifers and JLWOPS. After 20 years, juvenile can apply to DOC for a move to  a stepdown program  which will be held in a minimum-  R.  Head of DOC or his designee will determine who will  be accepted for the program. Conduct inside DOC is a  big factor. Once accepted the prisoner will complete a  re-entry program and after serving 25 years can apply  for early parole.  Senate bill 181: Sentencing Reform bill deals only with  juveniles serving life without parole and brings Colorado  into compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court.  Court will have two choices in re-sentencing. After a re-  sentencing hearing in which mitigating factors such as  age at time of crime, circumstances surrounding crime,  etc. will be considered. 1) 40 years minus earned time. Lifetime parole.   (Hopefully reserved for the worst of the worst.)  2) 24 to 48 with a judge deciding upon the number of  years. Judge could sentence prisoner to any range  within the 24 to 48 years, depending on factors outlined  in bill. Earned time would be applied meaning the  prisoner would have to serve 75% of sentence minus  earned time, which will depend upon prisoner’s  behavior inside prison.    10 years on parole.   HEARING: APRIL 20, 2016  DENVER STATE  CAPITOL, 1:30 P.M.